Sunday, April 19, 2009


Can This Harlequin Cover Be Saved?


Frankly, I’m waiting with bated breath to see what kind of cover HQN will award Susan Grant’s forthcoming science fiction romance—you know, the one featuring a heroine space pirate. As many of you know, Ms. Grant hasn’t exactly lucked out when it comes to covers for her SFR books. There’s been very little consistency, and the stock image lameness is enough to make the book gods weep.

See what I mean?


Susan Grant Moonstruck


A crying shame, right? Yet, all is not lost. To HQN, I say, it’s not too late! You have a righteous chance to create a stunning, envy-inducing cover for Ms. Grant’s space pirate book. Wow us with your ingenuity and marketing savvy, because we know you have the cojones. (Right?)

In other words, space pirates are full of badass awesomesauce, so screw this one up at your peril.

Obviously, I keep giving this issue a lot of thought. Not just for space pirate stories, but for all science fiction romances, because branding is very important. One reason is that when I and others *cough*LoveLetter*cough happily spread positive word of mouth about the books we enjoy, it can only help matters sales if there’s an intriguing cover in the mix. I mean, why would a publisher shoot itself in the foot by killing a book’s chances before it’s even out the door? Honestly, who does that?

So I’d like to outline what kind of cover would help make a splash for Ms. Grant’s space pirate book. I thought it’d be an interesting exercise to break down the elements that could should go into her cover, but from the point of view of each party involved. My goal is to include ideas that everyone might agree about and/or perceive as important, not just what I personally would want.

Well, mostly.


The Publisher

Let’s kick things off with the title. For space opera, a title with an epic feel should just roll off the tongue. HQN, please greenlight a title for Ms. Grant’s book that’s really organic to the story instead of relying on trendy keywords. Also, don’t even think about resorting to the whole tempting the pirate/seducing the pirate/bride of the pirate nonsense. (Even historical romances don’t deserve such trivial titles.) Ms. Grant is writing about a heroine space pirate which alters the relationship dynamic considerably. Her book is not a historical romance in space, so please don’t package it that way.

(But a little sexiness in the title can’t hurt, either.)

HQN, you almost can’t go wrong with an illustrated cover. Or, at the very least, a customized photo shoot. Spending some $$$ will send the message that you care enough to send the very best book out into the world. Since covers can make or break a book, investing more up front is worth its weight in gold. I figured you’ve saved a bundle with Susan Grant’s covers to date, so she’s overdue for a cover overhaul.

Here’s more food for thought. Since “sometimes Harlequin has trouble finding male models for the cover photo shoots,” feel free to forego the hero altogether on this particular book. You save money, and readers will have heroine Valeeya Blue all to themselves. Boo-yah!

The Bookseller

We know that as far as selling romance books, it’s all about the clinch. Not just any clinch will do, however. Booksellers, I’m sure you’ll pass on convoluted pretzel contortions in favor of a tasteful yet striking embrace.

What other elements appeal to booksellers? Well, why not take a “cover” from Mike Resnick’s STARSHIP: PIRATE:

STARSHIP: PIRATE


How great is that illustration? I picked up that book just based on the cover & title alone—something I rarely, rarely do. And then the blurb promised a female space pirate! Alas, no romance, as I had hoped, but the cover sure is swoon-worthy.

What about reworking that illustration so that the hero and heroine are facing each other? They don’t have to be touching for it to convey romance. It’s all in the facial expressions, and the blurb of Ms. Grant’s story will confirm the customer’s first impression of the cover.

Wait—do I hear the sound of customers scooping up her book in droves and running for the cash registers?

The Author

The author’s main responsibility is to deliver a great story. If that job is done well, the story would inevitably include exciting scenes that would inspire great covers. What author wouldn’t be pleased as punch with a cover featuring a cool scene from the story?

Another idea would be featuring illustrations that accurately represent the characters. In MOONSTRUCK, for example, Ms. Grant worked hard to describe Finn, her space pirate hero. He was hot and dressed to the nines in pirate gear, and what does HQN do? That’s right: #Coverfail.

Authors don’t have much control over covers, but they do have control over whether or not they communicate to their publisher about their covers. And remember, bloggers blog about two kinds of covers: Bad ones—and great ones.

The Reader

Jack Sparrow PirateCheck out Captain Jack Sparrow from PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN (made you look, didn’t I?!). Yes, Johnny Depp’s performance sells the character, but he also contributed significantly to the character design. I found his outfit infinitely distracting because it had so much going on—almost a character in and of itself. The clothes elevated Sparrow to a whole ‘nother level.

Especially in the case of a heroine space pirate, it’s all about the accessories. If an author describes this kind of character with a to-die-for headband/hairstyle or a unique sounding gun or sleek red boots, I want to see that on the cover. Whatever the look, give us the visual to enjoy and drool over. Because yes, in the case of Ms. Grant’s book or any other, I want to vicariously experience becoming this eternally hip heroine, and a well illustrated cover or meticulously costumed, expertly photographed model is the closest I’ll ever get to being a real space pirate.

I’ll gladly fork over $6.99 for that kind of fantasy.

So, how would you design the cover?

Joyfully yours,

Heather


15 comments:

Karin Shah said...

Oh, goody! (If I can actually post this) I get to be the first comment!

Great blog, Heather! I don't think I would put only the herione on the cover, because that is PR department speak for Urban Fantasy. A man on the cover equals Romance. A woman by herself UF. I didn't make the rules, but I learned them since I enjoy paranormal romance, but not somuch Urban Fantasy with it's usual lack of an HEA.
So we need both heroine and hero on the cover and I think we should have the Heroine standing, pointing a blaster (or the like) in the direction of the camera. The hero should be behind her looking to the side as if she is protecting him and he is watching her six. (Remember Space Above and Beyond?)

Karin Shah


Kimber An said...

WEll, lemme think...

If memory serves, the love story involves a couple who were once so involved that offspring resulted.

I picture a scruffy-looking studmuffin, arms folded with a bit of snarl on his lips, standing back to back with the Heroine whose tight pants and tank top shows off the fact that she is still One Hot Mama, despite the inevitable stretch marks from spawning pirate offspring. (Psst, don't show the stretch marks, 'kay? And a sturdy bra is a given.). I picture a smirk on her face. And then their kid should be standing off to the side with a look of disgust, certain he's going to hurl breakfast if his parents actually do the Nasty Thing AGAIN! I mean, c'mon, aren't they too old for that? And, you know, he's never quite forgiven his mommy for cleaning a smudge off his face right after she blasted a Trikelian Slug-Worm off his speeder-bike in front of that cute girl from his intergalactic distance education class.

Well, one thing's for sure, Susan can count on her readers to set the rest of the world straight even we she doesn't get an effective book cover.


Natalie Hatch said...

Female Space Pirates = Awesome.
I agree with the Moonstruck title and cover, it does not look like an SFR to me, I thought it was maybe a paranormal intrigue or something similar.


Marilynn Byerly said...

I imagine the cover was created to deliberately hide the fact that the book is SFR. That's been SOP, in most cases, for many years for the big publishers. The blurbs also tend to hide the fact that it is SFR.

All this does is make readers who don't like SFR annoyed when they buy a book they won't enjoy, and those who love it fail to recognize it as SFR, and they don't buy it. A lose/lose situation for everyone.

Heck, if they'd even made the gun a blaster rather than a generic contemporary gun, that would have helped.


Susan Macatee said...

I've just started reading Moonstruck and have to agree--after reading the description of the pirate hero--that's what I want to see on the cover! The cover as is, is a real disappointment. I would've loved to see the pirate hero and the beautiful Admiral face to face with a real sci-fi cover.


Barbara said...

Great post. I hope that someone at HQN listens and gives Susan Grant a fabulous cover that matches her wonderful story.


Heather Massey said...

Karin, congratulations, lol! Like your idea of the blaster. Good point about UF. And SF book covers/movie posters do often include multiple characters, which is one aspect I like about them.

Kimber An, too funny! I agree that we will help resolve the disconnect involving an ineffective cover, but I have to wonder why publishers wouldn't want us spending 100% of our time talking about the story instead of the cover that went astray....

Hi, Natalie! I hear *your* story is coming along fabulously ;).

Hi, Marilynn! Thanks for reading. You are so right and yet I still can't wrap my head completely around that kind of marketing. I can understand softening the SF elements, but like you said, obscuring them just frustrates readers.

Susan, exactly!

Thanks, Barbara! Fingers crossed, eh?


Jess Granger said...

I think some of it goes back to the idea that you can either market to SF, or you can market to Romance, which is completely stupid.

I think there's a way to market to both. SFR does need its own "cover code." And people are still working on it.

Look at how far paranormals have come. Back in the day when you couldn't find a paranormal to save your life, vampire stories were hidden behind old historical clinch covers, but the guy was looking at the girl's neck, (or maybe it was her boobs). Nothing about those covers spoke the "code" that this was a paranormal romance in the way we see them now.

I think SFR is having the same issue. I think out of all the SFR covers I've seen, STARJACKED, and Linnea Sinclair's covers are awesome!

So here's my vote for the new "code.

#1, put a star field in the background. That can be the SFR code for there is SF in this Romance.

#2, get the characters on there, make them large, and dress them right. Looking at one another, looking away, just the hero, I don't care, but at least hint at the actual details of the character. Making a character who was blatantly described as looking like Capt. Jack Sparrow look like a clean cut secret service agent, isn't even close.

I love the stripes on the back of the hero on my cover. While they don't seem like a real part of him, they visually suggest the image that this is a character with a striped back. So it hints at the otherworldness of my hero, but doesn't freak people out with it, or make people think he's a shape shifting tiger, which he is not.

But authors have NO control over these things. When SFR starts really hitting its stride, the big publishers will work out that code. But the place the code can really develop is in the ebooks. Ebook cover artists seem to be a little more flexible.


Mystery Robin said...

I wholeheartedly agree with this post. Let's sign a petition!!


Heather Massey said...

Jess, exactly. I agree there's wiggle room to market to both, as you say. I think I remember those historical clinch covers you referenced. Good point, I'd forgotten about those.

Great suggestions, also. Star fields rule! Your cover definitely reflects the story and hero (which is evident from the first chapter). A #Coverwin, imho.

Obviously, readers have even less control over covers than authors. But that won't stop me from talking about them, and about images I'd like to see! I just hope that the time of needing to hide a book's genre will end soon. Both romance and science fiction are evolving so much and splintering into so many different subgenres that the idea of obscuring a book's content seems like a task that would be increasingly difficult to accomplish.

I imagine that covers vary also as a matter of artists varying in style/skill level (or what publishers are instructing artists to do). Across all genres there is clearly a huge amount of experimentation going on with covers, so that gives me hope that a really swell code will eventually be worked out for SFR.

Hi, Robin! Thanks so much for your comment.


Liz said...

I agree that SF-Romance covers leave a LOT to be desired (although if we're on the topic of Susan Grant specifically, let me say that I thought the cover for "Your Planet or Mine?" was awesome, inspired, and set just the correct tone). As a SF-Romance fan for the last 15 or so years, I've been overjoyed to find them more and more often. I would LOVE to see Susan Grant's books covered with something more representational (not for me, though - I have/will read everything she writes just because it's Susan Grant and I think she rocks) so that more of us SF-Romance people will learn about her and love her.


NathalieGray said...

I've been in lurrrve with Susan from the first moment I sat beside her at a book signing a couple of years ago. She *exudes* confidence and strength. Plus, I had a serious case of clothes envy (but that's another conversation...:)

Yes, I want covers that are a bit more edgy (maybe that's not the right word) for SFR. I'm always a bit irked when someone tells me "oh, we couldn't put more techie stuff on the cover because that would turn off female readers". Dude, please. There's a balance, and we can appeal to a wide audience, male and female, romance readers or not. It can be done. It is being done. We just need more of it!


Heather Massey said...

Liz, thanks for your input. You're right, Susan did have covers that matched the tone of previous books. Makes me wonder what changed, though. I suppose that kind of thing is going to happen occasionally with multi-pubbed authors, but it just seemed as though the cover for MOONSTRUCK went way off the mark.

Hi, Nathalie! I agree, it can be done, and I sure hope lots of brainstorming is going on right now, especially at Harlequin headquarters. Techie stuff does not necessarily equal unsexy or a lack of sensuality. And you touched upon something I'm going to talk about in my next post...you are psychic, woo-woo!


Kimber An said...

What happened is Susan switched publishers from Dorchester to Harlequin. And HQN seems to have had a challenging time figuring out just what to do with her stories. Such is life when you 'color outside the lines!' I thing the WARLORD'S cover is certainly the best so far with HQN. It does have excellent whiplash effect. Just doesn't tell us a darn thing about the story, other than 'hot guy and hot nookie contained herein.' True, but there's a whole heck of a lot more to the story.
:)


Heather Massey said...

Good point, Kimber An. Dorchester's creative team might have more flexibility.


Post a Comment


 

All original content © Heather M., 2010. All rights reserved. Blog hosted by Blogger.com using the ButterflyMagic Template.