Perhaps you've recently heard about the infamous post in which the author rants and raves about how women are destroying the very foundation of science fiction. If not, here are a few excerpts:
Science fiction is a very male form of fiction. Considerably more men than women are interested in reading and watching science fiction than women. This is no surprise. Science fiction traditionally is about men doing things, inventing new technologies, exploring new worlds, making new scientific discoveries, terraforming planets, etc. Many men working in the fields of science, engineering, and technology have cited science fiction (such as the original Star Trek) for inspiring them when they were boys to establish careers in these fields.
What has happened is that science fiction on television has for the most part become indistinguishable from most other television shows which are written for women filled with moronic relationship drama. Sure the moronic relationship drama is in space, but . . . its not science fiction anymore, and men are not interested in moronic relationship drama in space…
With women killing science fiction on television, the current generation of boys won't have this opportunity to be inspired to work in these fields. There is still a great deal of written science fiction that is real science fiction so all is not lost. However, many boys who would have gone on to make scientific discoveries and invent new technologies will not do so since they will never be inspired by science fiction as boys.
The above misogynistic vitriol in the quoted article (not to the mention the homophobic undertones) represents an extreme view of women in SF (as readers, writers, etc.). Unfortunately, it’s hardly a new attitude.
In response to the Smart Bitches post on the topic, Cora (#86) notes that “…the attitude behind the article is not that uncommon in the SFF community. Because there are a lot of people in the SFF community (and not all of them are male) who have serious issues with the changing genre landscape and particularly the influx of female fans and writers.”
I urge you to read her comment in its entirety, and perhaps you know of other examples of those who have serious issues.
John Scalzi also posted about the issue, although the several hundred comments seem to have devolved into something rather messy.
There were a few notable insights presented at io9 that are relevant to science fiction romance:
"People are piling onto this guy in a giant hatefest not just because he's an easy target. He's also a safe target. And that's what worries me. Because sexism still exists in the world of science fiction, but it is just more politely masked than this guy's overt outlier opinions. Anthologies of 'great' SF are still routinely published without a single woman's contribution included. Publishers often push women in a subtle way to focus on fantasy and paranormal writing. Even among so-called enlightened SF literati it is not uncommon to hear people say that women can't write hard SF."
And this:
"Fantasy publishing is exploding partly because it's one of the genres where women authors are valued by the publishing industry, and so women interested in speculative writing are fleeing to fantasy when they find the SF clubhouse doors locked. Where are the great new female hard SF writers and space opera directors and showrunners? We aren't hearing from them because the SF community doesn't believe that women truly love SF. And so people with power - unlike Spearhead guy - aren't publishing women or giving them development deals." [All emphasis mine]
SF publishers aren’t the only ones operating on outdated assumptions. I don’t think some of the movers and shakers in the romance community believe that women “truly love SF” either. I don’t expect every romance reader to convert to SFR inside of a minute just because it’s so great and all (*wink*), but given the right circumstances, many are open to trying a book or two—more readers, I think, than publishers are willing to admit exist, nurture, or invest in finding.
But science fiction romance has obstacles that go deeper than story quality, labels, or marketing dilemmas. There’s been a lot of propaganda for a long time that attempts to convince us all that SF and women don’t mix, let alone women and SF and romance. Sometimes we (women) perpetuate that propaganda ourselves. If not by overt behavior, then by inaction or complicity.
When I hear about aversion to stories that blend science fiction and romance, the above issues immediately come to mind. The number of romance readers who might enjoy SFR is artificially low because many of us have been conditioned to believe the female gender has no innate interest in science or speculative fiction. How many times have women been discouraged from pursuing careers in science over the past century? I’ll bet the number is astronomically high.
Then there’s the fact that on top of women writing and being fans of science fiction, some of us want to read character-driven stories as well. SF stories involving romance and relationship dynamics are very threatening to certain parts of SF fandom. The fear that the existence of one type of story will squeeze out another is downright bizarre.
The refreshing part is that no matter how many readers shudder in response to SF with romance or to romance with SF, artists charge ahead and combine them anyway. Both the SF and romance communities are saying and doing two different things. I guess we homo sapiens are funny diverse like that.
Let’s strive for gender equality in science fiction—and in romance. Let’s be unapologetic about the fact that we love books that mix romance and science fiction. Authors, be unapologetic about the fact that you write them. Let’s lose the shame of the romance or the science fictional aspects. Instead of rewarding misogynistic attitudes with attention (short-term solution), we can all positively reinforce progressive attitudes and actions (long-term solution).
We—male and female and romance and science fiction fans alike—must unlock that door. Come on. Let’s forge the key right now.
Joyfully yours,
Heather
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
A Call For Gender Equality in Science Fiction, Once and For All
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




26 comments:
As a science teacher and an avid science fiction reader I had to laugh when I read his diatribe, but everone's entitled to their own opinions. His will not affect me or my writing, I will continue to write moronic relationship drama in space because I like it, I really like it. Gene Roddenbery, Robert Heinlein, Arthur Clarke all wrote 'moronic relationship drama in space' so I think I'm in good company. LOL
I say 'So what?' Why not create something bigger and better?
This guy and the kind of SF he's talking about will die out for the very simple reason that
*ONLY WOMEN CAN MAKE BABIES.*
And most babies are raised by women, which means they have most of the influence on the children.
Thanks to societal evolution, women can now insist upon LOVE before they make babies and then raise them.
No Sex, No Love, No Babies, NO FUTURE.
I'm a science geek (not working as such, but the geekness sticks with you), married to a science geek, raising two future science geeks (My girls' favorite reading: The Visual Dictionary of Science). Our house is full of science fiction, with and without romance. Will the books inspire them to make new discoveries or create new technologies? Gosh, I hope so. And if they do that while learning about loving relationships, so much the better.
I'm trying to figure out why that guy thinks there aren't SF books out there that boys would like. Has he been to a bookstore in the past dozen or twenty years? Gobs of Star Wars novels, and authors like David Weber, Harry Harrison, Larry Niven. The problem may not be getting boys to read SF, but getting boys to read period.
I'm too busy writing girl cootie-infested space opera to waste a minute of time on that twerp and his opinions.
Well...except for that comment.
Back to the ship. My MCs are in a hell of a situation!
LOL, That's a good one Agent Z.
Whatever dudes. That's all I've got to say.
I'm not going anywhere, and I sure as heck ain't changing my tune.
Raises a brow. Don't tell me the dudes don't go for the SFR. I know better, boys.
Funny that they'd make such a stink out of women enjoying sci fi. I came home the other day to my 18 year old Marine son, Army Grunt Vet husband both sitting together on the couch watching a movie(a chic flick). Both had tears they were fighting. When they saw me, they got all macho, like sensitivity is a bad thing. Heaven forbid there's love in science fiction. Even in Star Wars there's a love story. Pleaseeeeee. Romance and softer elements in sci fi stories are not a bad thing and they know it. Besides, who says we chicks don't like a little action in our sci fi or a little harder sci fi? It's not exclusive to men only and I'm sure women have been reading these stories for years. Men have been reading romance for years. I read somewhere that around 27% of romance readers are male and that many of those men order books under their other halves names, to remain anon. Why?
I love to blow things up and battle scenes. Why can't men enjoy some of the softer elements in these stories without feeling less manly or feeling threatened we're invading man-land?
I think what both sexes bring to science fiction will only enrich it. No reason to get territorial. Besides, when you do that, we woman see it as a challenge.
Quit trying to figure us out. It will never happen.
Okay, I've wasted enough breath on that fools rant.
It's hard not to read that article without grinning. It is funny in a desperation sort of way. To suggest SFR is impeding the next generation of scientific minds rather than having the potential to inspire a much larger audience is just plain silly. The underlying message that only men are suitable to be great scientists--"With women killing science fiction on television, the current generation of boys won't have this opportunity to be inspired to work in these fields."--is equally moronic. The author only managed to expose his sadly flawed logic to the world instead of inciting any sort of male-backed battle cry.
The truth is SFR has expanded the bounds of SF, not inhibited it. Me thinks he doth protesteth too much. :]
Cathy, that's great! I love science, but I'm not too good at it. At least one of my children is a complete science geek though. She was reading my husband's college weather textbook at age four.
You want boys inspired by Science Fiction? Get them to read. Therein lies the problem. If teen boys rushed to bookstores in hordes the way teen girls do after the newest Twilight book, there'd be plenty of draw for authors to create some good and nasty speculative fiction full of grand scientific ideas and lots of explosions. Yeah, again, good luck with that. Because as we all know, *snort* girls don't like science and boys don't like to read.
Let's fix the what we expect from our youth, and maybe both issues will be solved.
BTW, the very first work of Science Fiction (according to many literary scholars) is Frankenstein.
Guess what? It was written by a woman. *Bows to Shelley.*
Again, I just have to laugh. Let's just say I'm not worried about a dearth of scientists.
All in all, I think this is good for us. There's nothing that will get women to read something faster than proclaiming they "shouldn't" read it. I know I love forbidden fruit.
Beautifully stated, Jess.
I'm really grateful to have found such a great community of SF authors and readers as we have here at The Galaxy Express. Great post!
Thanks for doing a column on this issue Heather. I recall reading Scalzi's post, but he didn't divulge any direct quotes or links (the spoilsport!). I took at look at the site, and I've never heard of the Spearhead, but man, they are a paranoid bunch! The latest post, "There is no honor in competition with women" had me laughing. Maybe I've found a new place for my daily comedy fix.
Awesome post, Heather. I couldn't agree more with what you said. I'd love to see more women writing hard SF which doesn't always have to be cold. Just ask Masamune Shirow (even though he's male ;-)) who did the Appleseed and Ghost in the Machine mangas.
Laurie, you said just what was on my mind. :-) Women have been writing SF long before this generation and will continue to do so. Lots of new voices are coming up in the genre, especially female authors, and I'm looking forward to seeing it grow for the next generation.
You do realize you can use 'only women can have babies' as a metaphor, right?
I remember reading a post about the author of the YA SF series THE UGLIES. He was asked why he writes YA SF and he quoted, 'The hand who rocks the cradle rules the world.' In effect, besides being fun, he says he gets to help shape the future of SF. This is from a male SF writer.
Anyone can mentor. It takes time, patience, and empathy.
And I still say who cares? Let's build something bigger and better!
Maybe the "new" SF will inspire more women to pursue science (with less boys to create a glass ceiling) and we can actually get something DONE around here.
Hee.
Okay, I know I know, but he deserved it.
Sometimes we (women) perpetuate that propaganda ourselves. If not by overt behavior, then by inaction or complicity.
This really struck a note with me, Heather. And here's why. I've seen bloggers bemoan the fact that SFR can't catch a break, that publishing companies won't buy more of it, and that they can't find any when they really, really want to read it.
I've also seen those same bloggers trash a book they don't like in reviews and tell others not to bother buying it.
Now, I don't expect everyone to like my books. We all have styles we prefer over others, and that's fine with me. There are books *I* can't stand.
But when you trash a book and tell others not to bother buying it, not only are you denying them the chance to form their own opinion, you lose your right to complain when the publishing company drops yet another SFR author from its stable. You lose the right to wonder why they won't publish more of the genre.
Hate a book if you want. It's your opinion, you've a right to it. But please, if you truly want to support the genre, don't tell others not to bother buying a book. You aren't hurting the author, because we're used to it. What you're doing is encouraging the publishers to chalk the whole the genre up as a money losing endeavor.
Okay, I'll step down off the soapbox now.
If someone doesn't buy a book because someone else said not to (because it stinks, because XYZ reason), then I'm not sure it's a big loss, eh.
Can you all count how many "because" I can cram in one sentence?
Forgot to say how I LOVED Scalzi's reply and his call for a female roller derby team armed with spears to go after these idiots at Idiot Central (or whatever it is called). Now THAT'S an image!
Nathalie said: If someone doesn't buy a book because someone else said not to (because it stinks, because XYZ reason), then I'm not sure it's a big loss, eh.
Nathalie, your right. I don't lose sleep if someone doesn't buy my book because of a review. The point I was trying to make is that publishing houses use low sales and readers comments as excuses not to publish more science fiction romance. We really need to support ANYONE who manages to sell if we want to keep the genre growing. Lets not give them more excuses to stop finding new authors than they can come up with on their own.
The reverse of that is also true, Katherine. If you find SFR you do like, get on the web in any forum you can and shout about it. Put the name of that book over and over anywhere you can online. There are too many readers that go, "Hey, that book was great," then sit on their fingers with that knowledge.
Heather is proof of what one person can do to create buzz. Now not everyone has to start a totally awesome blog, but Amazon reviews, and posts in readers forums that say, "Hey, I just read this book and it was fantastic!" do more for the genre than anything else can.
That's called buzz, and buzz sells books.
{thoughtful look}
My father is a retired biologist. I believe his interest in the sciences was inspired more by his mother, a naturalist, than by his father, a high school librarian. {Smile}
Anne Elizabewth Baldwin
Amen, Jess! That's it in a nutshell. The more people are talking about SFR, the more readers we'll have, the more publishers will buy, and thus, the more choices we'll have.
And Heather is fantastic. She's done more for the genre than anyone else I know.
Ditto on Heather's total blog awesomeness and SFR promoter extraordinaire.
And I agree. As SFR writers/fans, I think we sometimes shoot ourselves in the foot with public slamming of SFR books. I only write reviews on books I enjoy. Books I love I tell everyone about (how many times have I mentioned Sandra McDonald's THE OUTBACK STARS in the last year?) *smirk*
I also have a "May I recommend..." side bar on my blog where I list SFR books that I recommend. (I hope to add a lot more books to the list, hopefully even some currently in my Leaning Tower of TBR.)
I must admit I haven't been doing my part in writing reviews on Amazon, so that's going to change. Thanks for the reminder, Jess.
I write many genres, but among my favorites is pulp sci-fi. I am female, I am an avid sci-fi fan, and I write fun, exciting, and imaginative sci-fi. I invite anyone who wants to challenge my female sci-fi writing abilities to read my RR/HSN collaborative release, LOVE IN SPACE.
http://www.cerebralwriter.com/new-releases.html
As a scientist and a writer, I encountered such naked knuckle-dragging in several self-labeled "progressive" groups. Here's my take on it:
Is It Something in the Water? Or: Me Tarzan, You Ape
http://www.starshipnivan.com/blog/?p=712
Thanks for the link to your piece, Athena! Very insightful.
Post a Comment