Color me gobsmacked when I came across a post at Geeks of Doom titled “10 Ways To Make A Kick Ass Version of Space: 1999.”
"Well cool," went my thought. I adore SPACE: 1999 and the team there did a fabulous job with a super idea. Later, I just couldn’t stop thinking about it. So, like a shameless number crunching Hollywood executive, I had to rush out and greenlight my own copycat production.

Therefore, I proudly present BATTLE BEYOND THE STARS (1980) for an Extreme Makeover! This slice of cinematic swiss cheese has a fundamentally strong story, but the thrift store production values makes it overdue for a transformation. I have a love affair with BBTS dating back to high school. I was too young to score a ticket when it premiered in the theatre, but the film gained my undying devotion during many a subsequent television broadcast.
The premise is terrific: BATTLE BEYOND THE STARS is about the pacifist citizens of planet Akir who hire a band of ragtag mercenaries to protect them from an evil warlord bent on world domination. However, there’s a reason the premise not only rocks, but also sounds suspiciously familiar: BBTS is basically a remake of THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN, which itself is a remake of Akira Kurosawa’s SEVEN SAMURAI.
It was also written with aplomb by John Sayles, who has brought us sagacious, “important” films like RETURN OF THE SECAUCUS SEVEN, EIGHT MEN OUT, LONE STAR, and more.
Just check out the tagline:
Rebels. Outlaws. Mercenaries. Seven magnificent warriors join to fight the... Battle Beyond The Stars.
If all that seems too fantastic to believe, just watch the trailer:
With a 2 million dollar budget, it was exploitation king Roger Corman’s most expensive undertaking. Does the luxurious financing show in the production values? Heck, no. I did mention this was a Roger Corman gig, right? Much of that money went above-the-line to the high priced stars (at the time), George Peppard and Robert Vaughn. (And Roger Corman was notorious for re-using model shots in other films. For example, set your Netflix phasers to SPACE RAIDERS.)
Corman had vision and an unerring sense when it came to picking talent, giving everyone from James Cameron to Francis Ford Coppola and Jack Nicolson a shot early in their careers. But, visionary though he was, the man was always severely hampered by his insistence on "safe," shoestring budgets.
This means BATTLE BEYOND THE STARS fans had to suspend their disbelief like nobody’s business despite a story whose essence is truly timeless. Since Hollywood is currently on a remake rampage, the time seems advantageous to bring this classic science fiction B movie back to the big screen.
Herewith, my notes for the latest incarnation:
1) Fire Roger CormanI adore the man's chutzpah and admire his career and appreciate his taste in films. After all, would we have experienced the spectacular spectacle X: THE MAN WITH THE X-RAY EYES if not for him? (And don’t, as I initially made the mistake of doing, knock the soundtrack to that film, composed by Les Baxter. That cat wrought the hippest jungle jazz ever.)
But sorry, Roger. I can’t let you get your paws on my project. Instead, I’m going to hire Hollywood’s new wunderkind director Zack Snyder of 300 and WATCHMEN fame to helm my 100 million dollar version. We’ve seen what Zack can do with sexy Spartans, superheroes, & CGI—now it’s time for him to tackle a science fiction romance extravaganza. (Sure his agent will ask for an insane fee, but let Mr. Snyder add a zombie or two. He'll be happy.)
2) Take the John-Boy out of Shad
Richard Thomas, bless his heart, brought a mix of earnestness and innocence to the role of Shad, the hero who embarks on the quest for the mercenaries that will defend his beloved planet Akir. But the role, as both written and played, is too vanilla and saccharine for today’s audiences. Such a key part demands scrubbing off any lingering scent of THE WALTONS.
Therefore I just requested that the casting director shortlist actor James McAvoy for the role. As the faun Mr. Tumnus in 2005’s THE LION, THE WITCH, AND THE WARDROBE, he showed he can deliver earnestness minus any cloying sweetness. But it’s his compelling, darker role in ATONEMENT that will give Shad edge and bring depth to the hero’s character arc.
(And it doesn't hurt that he’s real purty to look at, too!)
(Oops! That would be the Wrong Picture.)
3) Raise the romance stakes
Nanelia, played by Darlanne Fluegel, is the daughter of robotics expert Dr. Hephaestus, an old ally of Akir. When Shad looks the good doctor up, Hephaestus traps him for the nefarious purpose of breeding with his daughter. It’s love at first sight for Nanelia, however, and she frees Shad in order to join him on the quest.
Neither Shad nor Nanelia play too hard to get. I propose changing that. A script tweak could introduce some darker plot twists: What if Nanelia kills her father (to unfold onscreen) while escaping? As violence is against Shad’s nature, he’d have a world of processing to do—not to mention what he’d have to explain to his mother—in order to justify a relationship with her.
Having grown up in an inbred society of androids, it’d make for a more satisfying relationship dynamic to show what Nanelia has to learn about true love. The bottom line is that anything increasing the sexual tension between this pair will make for a more enriching romance. [Edited to add: Copious amounts of PG-13 sex couldn’t hurt, either.]
4) Give Nestor a Borg makeover
Mercenary Nestor is a group of clones who share the same consciousness. Nestor is polite and white, brave and boring. Let’s make this new version sizzle with a dark, messy, complex organism bordering on the phantasmagorical. In other words, lots of ropey, gooey tentacles and stuff.5) Cut the lizard loose
According to IMDB, “Screenwriter John Sayles had originally envisioned the [mercenary] character of Cayman as a brooding dark humanoid....” While I’m not opposed to including characters of exotic alien races, I don’t think prosthetics technology has quite yet reached the point of rendering such a character very believably. That definitely wasn’t the case around 1979, when the film would most likely have been in production.
In this new version, he will be a she—a sexy female space pirate with a lithe body and clingy black shipsuit hugging all of her curves in just the right places. Since this is a space opera, she’ll sport a black eye-patch and leather gunbelt with a sleek vintage pistol.
That’ll deliver a new level of shivers to the scene where she kidnaps Nanelia, heh heh!
6) In: Urban Cowboys. Out: Rustic Cowboys
While George Peppard’s cigar-smoking, whiskey-swilling Cowboy character radiated retro cool (and must have been a nod to THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN), the new version of BBTS has to accomplish more than just shock and dazzle the senses—it has to attract that crucial 18-24 male demographic. Therefore, I suggest a retrofit of the character, although I’m torn between two ideas. The first would entail altering the character’s backstory. This mercenary would still be a gun-runner, but one who stole expensive artillery from the Malmori, his former employer and enemy of Akir. He’d have a conscionable reason, of course. Having used the goods to trick out his freighter a la Pimp My Ride, he’s now on the run. This element gives him more motivation than Peppard’s Cowboy had to join Shad’s army.
For the actor, I’m thinking Ice Cube, using his character Craig Jones from the movie FRIDAY as inspiration.
That’s one idea. The other would be to make the character a duo. Keep the same backstory, but use actors Harold Lee and Kumar Patel of HAROLD AND KUMAR GO TO WHITECASTLE fame. Either way, something will be smoked. Hilarity ensues.
7) No boobs is good news
Nell. Oh heavens, where do I start? Nell is an old-fangled spaceship bequeathed to Shad by his mentor Zed. She’s as much a character as anyone else in the film and guides Shad through some pretty rough battles. I’m all for keeping the name and her salty yet maternal personality, but those obnoxious boobs have got to go. I mean come on, a starship with rootin’ tootin’ mammaries? I’m banishing them to the Phantom Zone.
Instead, I recommend redesigning her with an ugly caterpillar hull. As the story progresses, she can undergo a mysterious transformation and evolve into a beautiful butterfly starship by story’s end. Every time part of the ship alters, it will raise the stakes because Nell won’t be able to function properly during battle or escape scenes.
Now because this is a copycat production, I’m stopping here. As soon as my assistant delivers my steaming double soy latte I’ll ring Peter Jackson to inform him of his new producing job.
Oh yeah, I almost forgot. No need to change the title. It’s catchy, epic, and as romantic as a candlelit dinner.
I am, however, instating a new tagline:
BATTLE BEYOND THE STARS: More Battles! More Beyonder!
Joyfully yours,
Heather

21 comments:
okay what was the alternative title, come on let me know....
I vote for Ice Cube, btw
And please, you can't stop there. What about Robert Vaughn's character, Gelt? Oh and can he now die this time? *grin*
Oops, it's early - for me anyway - that should be NOT die this time, lol
I've just looked at the film poster again. They mammaried up the ship, big time. It even has nipples.
Kim <--- who has to wash her eyes out now.
Gee, Heather, I don't know a darn thing about BATTLE BEYOND THE STARS, except what I just read here. However, I do like your choice of actors - James McAvoy and Ice Cube. Studmuffins both, but each in their own way.
;)
Natalie, for like a week it was "This Ain't Your Dad's Movie Anymore"!
I liked it alot but then as the hour grew late right before posting I got punchy silly and changed a few things at the last minute. So I wasn't kidding when I said I will forever associate BBTS with your dad!
Kim rees, thanks for stopping by! I think Ice Cube would get my vote, too. He'd be so cool in an SF film, especially a role that mined both his comedic abilities and intensity.
I thought Gelt was pretty perfect as is--hard to improve on Robert Vaughn. Except maybe I'd have him look somewhere other than the ceiling every now and then!
Maybe he should live and get it on with the pirate mercenary--yeah baby! That'd be another good romantic subplot. Gelt with a lizard, not so much.
Kimber An, how are your hands/wrists feeling? Watching BBTS would give you a great chance to rest them, lol!
Seriously, I think you would enjoy this movie alot. It's action adventure romantic SF that everyone can enjoy. Because of artists like screenwriter John Sayles and James Cameron who did some of the model shots, the film is elevated above it's B movie status.
I can't tell y'all how much I would LOVE to see another version of this made into a movie. I love the premise and would adore having two versions of it. I'd buy the dvd too so the studio behind it could become rich, rich, rich!!!
Get in on with a pirate mercenary and have a baby? Awesome! (Yeah, I know I read that wrong, but let me have my fantasy, okay?)
Have him get it on with a sexy lizard mercenary babe. That could give you all kinds of edgy. If you budget is bottomless I think the tech is there for a very well rounded non-human character if you go CGI mimic of an actor, like Gollum in LoTR, instead of latex and puppet route.
I have only vague memory of this movie as being painfully horrid and cheesy, but even if you were starting from scratch, your suggestions all sound good to me.
Oh, mfitz, if they're going to get it on, but not have alien hybrid larva they're really going to need that latex!
More Battles! More Beyonder!
Ok, that's it. You are definitely writing my next tag line. ;)
Yeah, a makeover is way overdue. The best thing about this one was the cool title. But it all went down the gravity well from there. Your version sounds lightyears better.
mftz, that would be so righteous! And a romance like that should be taken seriously. I mean, we kind of jest, but I'd love to see a romance like that. I wouldn't even question that they are two different species. I'd just be like, wow, look who's hooking up--Gelt and Mercenary Lizard Babe!
I think BBTS is an example of both the wonderful and the awful in SF films. The vision was there, but the sub-par production values undermined it.
It's strange to have watched so many similar movies over the years, where I have to suspend my disbelief not just for the story but also for bad special effects. When judging a movie like BBTS, I have to ask myself if the story/dialogue/acting made up for the low budget limitations.
I've also wondered how much crappy F/X has scared away potential fans. Because let's face it, it's hard to look past that at times. Or most of the time.
Thanks, Laurie! That tagline is there because my pulp SF roots are showing! Let's all cross our fingers and hope that a wicked cool remake will be done, because this is a story that could really catch on, and deservedly so.
Re: the scaring of potential fans--is it the poor special effects that are the problem, or is it the lizards in space factor? Or both?
What about an SF movie with F/X for creatures/characters like Gollum (in space)? Would that make a difference?
How about bumping up the heroine's role? That poor actress didn't even get a mention in the trailer. Who would play her in the remake? My vote goes for making it a break out role for some Bollywood lovely.
I can't believe I've never seen this movie. I loves me some John Sayles. I've seen the Secret of Roan Innish more times than is healthy for a grown woman.
Hmmm. Should I put it on my Netflix list or just wait for the juicy remake?
Glad you thought my idea was righteous. Guess I have a market base of at least one, if I ever get my novel done, although my alien chick is more feathered theropod than lizard. :-)
I think we all have our "Guilty Pleasure" SF flicks that we enjoy even if the SPFX are wretched and the plots non-tangential. I've always sort of enjoyed "Earth Girls Are Easy" and not only does it have made-over-summer-vacation-from-film-school effects, it's a musical.
What about an SF movie with F/X for creatures/characters like Gollum (in space)? Would that make a difference?
I just had a Jar Jar Binks flashback... *shudder*
I know he wasn't an actor with a the oh-so-attractive skin-tight green suit...but he's put me off CGI characters in space. Possibly for several lifetimes ;-)
And would you have to put Robert Vaughn in some sort of youth-restoring device? Him as he is now in a remake? Not so dark and intimidating, lol
Kim - who should be plotting...
Heather, to answer your question, its the cheesy special effects, the low budget sets, the over-the-top campiness (which almost ruined sci-fi IMHO) and the poor dialogue. Even with everything NOT going for it, I still get little glimpses of potential that hint how good this one could be in the right hands.
Z, I agree Nanelia needs more screen time. She could be played by Miss Piggy. Kidding.
Have you seen Sayle's LONESTAR? Blew me away.
mftz, feathered theropod, hmmm? Sounds intriguing! I agree about the guilty pleasure films. Probably one of my favorites is SANTA CLAUS CONQUERS THE MARTIANS. No romance there but I can guarantee 100% that film--if you can call it that--will leave you in stitches. I saw EARTH GIRLS ARE EASY quite a while ago. Fluffy fun.
I do like Jeff Goldblum a lot. Loved THE FLY remake with him.
Kim, I know. I worry that He Who Shall Not Be Named ruined things for future films. Probably at least for a decade or two. But Gollum proved you can have a dark, layered CG character, so perhaps there's hope.
Laurie, exactly. I often wonder if many films shouldn't have been made because of the primitive special effects. It's really hard to do big epic space opera on a shoestring budget. Lucas showed the extent to which it could be done, but even he pushed it at times, imho.
FIREFLY hinted at what could really be done on a modest (for Hollywood) budget.
Well, at least now things have changed significantly, and the creators of shows like BSG are using it to their advantage.
When we're all in our nineties (assuming no one here already is, lol), we can tell our grandchildren horror stories about having to endure cheesy F/X in our beloved SFF/SFR films.
I don't mind old-fashioned FX too much IF the writing, the acting, the dialogue, the story, etc is fantabulous. I'm a fan of teh cheezy Brit SF series after all, where the sets wobble and the aliens look like school science projects, but you stop noticing the cheapness of it all if THE DRAMA is gripping.
You don't need a multi-million doallar budget to be clever and creative. Oftimes, extravagant FX seems to take the place of cleverness and creativity.
I'm not a big fan of CGI. It gets way over used and I often feel like I'm watching a video game. Gollum, as others have pointed out, WAS very well done. When CGI is invisible and I don't even notice it's being used, I'm all for it. When I keep noticing it, it pulls me out of the story. I've turned away from a few movies, because it just seemed to be about showing off the CGI, at the expense of little things like, oh, writing, acting, conflict, etc.
Z, excellent points. I too can overlook low budget special effects if the story and everything else is good, but as you point out, ironically it can be more difficult to forgive too-slick CGI. Especially if the characters are two dimensional and the dialogue is simplistic.
One of my fave. movies of all time is the original Day the Earth Stood Still, which is about a primitive as it comes with SPFX, but has good acting and a good script. I feel ill just thinking of the butcher job they seem to be doing to the remake.
mftz, I agree, that was a really good film. I don't know why they're even remaking it.
Love Battle Beyond the Stars !! Cowboys ship is one of my Favourites !!
Post a Comment